I believe that's a reference to the mostly-useless and highly extraneous flash at the top of the page. It's clean and crisp, but much larger than it needs to be, and serves no true purpose but to shout "hey, we're cool, we've got flash on our site."
I think we've finally got a new design here at work that will move our site out of that category, but currently, we fall square into 300 (more like 500 on our site) pixels of wasted space on our public site for no better reason than someone decided we needed flash on the page. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > interesting. What browser? I don't get that. I have nothing to do with the > site mind, but was thinking of making some comments to the guy about the > concept and was curious to see whether anyone here had the same thoughts. > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am curious as to the group's opinion of this: > > > > I think I am unlikely to scroll down past the 300 pixels of wasted > > vertical space. Every single time I click on something I have to > > discover the content of the page all over again by scrolling down. > > > > The design reminds me a little of MySpace. > > > > -Cameron > > > > .... > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309440 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
