Huh, umm, well I know there is some new stuff in cf 9 to support full cfs script files. Maybe thats what he is talking about.
I'll install beta 3 and get back to you tonight. -----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 4:22 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: cf question strikethrough is not making it, let me try that again: I was wondering that because a little later it says: If you are using CF9 you can specify that CFB should generate the CFC using the new script component syntax instead of tags. > the paragraph that contains the sentence I questioned is heavily > edited but...here is an intermediate semi-consensus version minus some > comments, snark and questions. It's not quite the original but it's > close. This is a third-pass edit so theoretically this is technically > correct, if not elegantly expressed. This is a useful tool that allows you to reference the CFCs that CFB finds under on your server -- local or remote, as long as it is added to Servers. If you expand the tree under your server name, you will see a list of CFCs. If properly configured, you will see all of the CFCs from your various projects. Interestingly, you will also see CFCs that are part of the ColdFusion programming language, like for cfmail and cfquery for example. Under each CFC you can see all of your functions, and any arguments that each function accepts. Adobe added a very handy feature here. You can also right click on one of these functions and click insert CreateObject (there also one for cfinvoke), and CFB will create the full code snippet you 'd need to call this particular CFC function. > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I believe that this actually has changed as of CF9. >> >> The built in service tags (cfmail, cfhttp, cfpdf, cfftp, etc) in CF9 >> are now exposed in cfscript as objects. >> >> So if you want to do a form post using cfscript, you would do something like so: >> >> myconn = new Http(); >> myconn.url = 'http://google.com/' >> >> Since you are able to use the new keyword, instantiate an object and >> then dump that object, I'd say that all the service tags are now >> built-in CFCs in CF9. >> >> Judah >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:11 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > It's wrong factually. >> > >> > cfmail and cfquery are tags, not cfcs. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 3:08 PM >> > To: cf-community >> > Subject: Re: cf question >> > >> > >> > Really. The sentence as it stands is: >> > >> > Interestingly, you will also see CFCs that are part of the ColdFusion >> > programming language, like for cfmail and cfquery for example. >> > >> > I was proposing to use native instead but you're saying it's wrong in the >> > first place? Or does that "for" change the meaning? >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> no its a tag not a cfc. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > is it correct to describe cfmail as a CFC native to ColdFusion? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311862 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
