judah and loathe are both saying that based on the interface the sentence is confusing but not incorrect. Loathe is saying maybe the term should be facade classes. Judah is saying that Adobe itself is calling these cfcs. I am thinking that if the term is this controversial we should probably have a paragraph or two introducing it. The article might need to go back to the tech editor or the author. But I am interested in everyone's opinion, don't let me stop you...
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Cameron. I would see this as a tag exposed as an object, > or service, but not as a cfc. Components are very different, both in > how they are invoked, and the control the developer has over them. > IMO, referring to a tag as a cfc invites confusion. > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> noted. I am not sure what the "correct" nomenclature is. And while I >> am interested in the question, I am also pretty far behind in several >> projects, so if we can resolve the issue without me having to install >> cf builder and do 2 weeks of reading, that will increase the odd of >> faqu 9 not being subject to ridiculous delays, lol. Let's see what >> Judah and Loathe have to say > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311871 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
