On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > the problem i see with putting a cfc wrapper around the mail tag for > the benefit of cfscript is that its another layer of overhead.
Honestly, I would prefer a CFC wrapper over the tag. The minimal overhead it creates is well worth the backwards compatibility that it promotes. The other alternatives would be much more prone to create problems. I'd rather not see a CFC and tag maintained separately. Using a CFC wrapper on a tag allows the tag to remain "as is" for backwards compatibility while opening up the potential to call it as a service. Since the new service is leveraging the existing (solid and tested) tag code, it's more likely to be stable and future changes to the core tag will can be easily promoted to the service with a lower chance of introducing defects. -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311898 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
