What kills me is that one (1) set of bad data from an obscure school that no one had heard of is being used as the basis to shoot down an entire hypothesis.
-----Original Message----- From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 9:05 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: ah ha ha ha ha ha!!! Isn't that the beauty of science. A group of scientists can offer an opposing view and if that view is shown to be supported by the evidence then the hypothesis will be modified. This is all because science is about finding the facts, regardless of whether they agree with your original hypothesis or not. Meanwhile, the public gets a hold of a snippet of a dissenting view and says , "Ah ha! One group of scientists disagrees....the others must be wrong!". On Feb 14, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > > World may not be warming after all: > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312092 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
