some people just stupid their way through life. I am actually
beginning to question whether the population has the attention span
needed for any sort of public discourse.

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Scott Stewart
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What kills me is that one (1) set of bad data from an obscure school that no
> one had heard of is being used as the basis to shoot down an entire
> hypothesis.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 9:05 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: ah ha ha ha ha ha!!!
>
>
> Isn't that the beauty of science.  A group of scientists can offer an
> opposing view and if that view is shown to be supported by the evidence then
> the hypothesis will be modified.  This is all because science is about
> finding the facts, regardless of whether they agree with your original
> hypothesis or not.
>
> Meanwhile, the public gets a hold of a snippet of a dissenting view and says
> , "Ah ha!  One group of scientists disagrees....the others must be wrong!".
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
>>
>> World may not be warming after all:
>>
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312093
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to