Right, they are granted to the states or the people respectively. AKA the 10th Amendment.
I have no major problem with state and local laws in this arena. 4th - you are granted security in your person property and effects, doesn't mean someone can't look at you. 5th - I don't even see how this applies. Didn't look to see which is which so I'm going from memory and could have them out of order. The 1st, 2nd and 10th are the ones I'm most concerned with. -----Original Message----- From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:20 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, LRS Scout wrote: > > Also the word privacy is never mentioned in the constitution, it's an > invention of judicial activism. So there's something in there saying the government has the right to invade our privacy? I was pretty sure that the idea was, that "we" didn't have to enumerate all our rights, similar to this guy's take: http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/PrivacyRight.htm A shorter version by someone else: That's what the 10th Amendment is all about - government is strictly limited to doing those activities which are specifically authorized to it by the Constitution. Everything else is left to "the States, respectively, or to the People." No? And how does the 4th fit in there? Perhaps the 5th as well? :Den -- Accuracy is, in every case, advantageous to beauty, and just reasoning to delicate sentiment. In vain would we exalt the one by depreciating the other. David ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314469 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
