I thought your bringing that up had different meaning as well. Now we know what your intention was..still not sure I understand how it fits into conversation though.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > The kids had nothing to do with the email incident... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:03 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! > > > Is your email not threaded? > > Dana said: >> There's an invason of >> privacy there if you can use such a word for a politican who made her >> Down's syndrome son and teenaged daughter's sex life part of her >> campaign. > > So I said: >> So because you any many others claimed the child was her daughters she >> has no right to privacy? Start the wiretaps. > > Then you said: >> She is the one that put them in the spotlight and made them part of her >> campaign. That makes them fair game. > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> That is because you missed the train long ago Sam. You (I believe it was >> you) where complaining about the press using her kids in the debate and >> saying that her kids should be off limits. This has nothing to do with > the >> emai > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317344 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
