So because you any many others claimed the child was her daughters she has no right to privacy? Start the wiretaps.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We agree there. The stuff he found would not have been usable in > court. Publishing the business letters might have been a legitimate > free speech case, but that's not what he did. There's an invason of > privacy there if you can use such a word for a politican who made her > Down's syndrome son and teenaged daughter's sex life part of her > campaign. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317315 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
