"He was asked whether he would have voted for it. And he explained all the issues he had with it and was equivocating and refused to answer the question, evading instead. It seems pretty obvious to me that he would not have voted for it and does not support it."
Seems to me that he said he agreed with 9 out of 10 articles. It also seems that he said he did not know if a person should vote for something if he or she agrees with 90% of it. That's an interesting measuring stick. Do you think every congressman who has ever voted for a bill has agreed with 100% of the bill? "I don't think that Rand Paul is a racist but I do think that his interpretation of the balance of power between business rights and the rights of the community are grossly out of balance." Okay. That's much better than "That's why the Civil Rights Act was right and Rand Paul is wrong. Period.". Now you are stating opinion, instead of stating fact. Big difference. "Please show me a little more respect than that as I respect you." I showed you the same amount of respect. I used your example with you as the target :) No offense was taken be the way. It would take a lot more than someone on a list serve calling me a homo-phobe racist to make me take offense. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:319453 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
