The question is who made this decision and why. Was it made by the command structure in the Coast Guard, or by the White House? That is, was it a decision, however over-zealous, based on legitimate concerns of security, or based on political considerations?
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Originally, the Coast Guard wanted 300 feet, but backed down to 65. Does > that imply anything about motive ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322654 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
