Point from that article was we're not happy because we work hard and full time. If they interview two people for the article and one is a part time worker that puts no effort into his work they are doing the country a disservice. All the happy people in Denmark and they chose him to represent happiness? Could you imagine if half the country worked 25 hours doing rudimentary work and were supplemented by the government? That would mean the other half would work too hard and wouldn't be so happy.
The article is a joke and I'm amused someone linked to it to prove a point. On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So if neither of these is true, then what on earth is your point > regarding the amount of hours that this man works, and his sense of > achievement and happiness? > > And then what comparison are you drawing between the value system > regarding work of the US, as defined by yourself, and that described > in the article for Denmark? > > On 15 August 2010 10:53, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> No ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:324937 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
