Actually the thing with Jericho depends upon which archeologist you listen to. Every twenty years or so a new one comes along and debunks the previous one so the consensus keeps flipping as to whether or not the events could have happened as described. I wouldn't lean on archeology for either side of that argument.
And yeah, they lost me at the dinosaurs. And the whole 'everything was vegetarian in the Garden of Eden' thing....that's just preposterous. Seriously, how can anyone look at a raptor (just as an example since it's the most ludicrous one I can think of) and say "This is a creature meant to eat fruits and nuts." -----Original Message----- From: Eric Roberts [mailto:ow...@threeravensconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:36 AM To: cf-community Subject: RE: Talking about the religious right... I was looking at the slide show and at least one statement is completely false. It says that "archaeology has repeatedly confirmed that the Bible's historical details are accurate..." I can think of at least one incidence of archaeology disproving this. Archaeology has shown that the events surrounding the incident at Jericho could not have happened since if you go along the timeline based on other confirmed events before and after Jericho, at the time it would have taken place, Jericho was in a rather large period on not being inhabited. I love the dinosaurs next to the little girl feeding a squirrel a carrot...yeah right...little girl would have been ripped to pieces. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328132 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
