Great point. 1 out of 3 did the right thing.
If we could get those odds on every political maneuver across the spectrum, I think this country would be much better off. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Sisk, Kris <ks...@gckschools.com> wrote: > > Not only that, but if you consider this an attack "by the right" then > you also have to consider the warning the reporter got to be "by the > right". Therefore, although 'the right' was contemplating an action of > questionably ethics, the backed away from it. > > Unless, of course, you're going to give the right credit only for their > douche moves, in which case you're really no better than they are. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:04 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right... > > > i wouldn't consider that "by the right", but instead "by a jerk who > happens > to identify and work for the right." > > If, on the other hand, the right starts to champion him, then in my mind > they would become conflated. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328165 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
