No...it just happened that someone on the right, who initially agreed with it, finally got a case of belated morals and professionalism and realized that it was even too slimy for him and didn't want that attached to his credentials.
-----Original Message----- From: Sisk, Kris [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:16 PM To: cf-community Subject: RE: More dishonorable tactics by the right... Not only that, but if you consider this an attack "by the right" then you also have to consider the warning the reporter got to be "by the right". Therefore, although 'the right' was contemplating an action of questionably ethics, the backed away from it. Unless, of course, you're going to give the right credit only for their douche moves, in which case you're really no better than they are. -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:04 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: More dishonorable tactics by the right... i wouldn't consider that "by the right", but instead "by a jerk who happens to identify and work for the right." If, on the other hand, the right starts to champion him, then in my mind they would become conflated. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328211 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
