Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Obama did this to Mubarek intentionally, bringing in activists to the US for > training in protest actions, setting the stage for something to happen. > Clinton pushed Mubarek on democracy, the food crisis drove people into the > streets, and now here we are. Is it a coincidence that QE2 is driving > inflation in commodities like grain, or was that part of the plan, too? >
I'm not sure what any of that means, but what I was referring to was Mubarek's history: * After the 6-day war a deal was cut that put his group in power and gave them aid (i.e. $$) in exchange for peace with the West including Israel (which, btw, means our tax dollars pay for Egyptian bullets should those bullets be used against the people) * Bush's "Freedom Agenda" pushed during his first term (incl Egyptian "reform" for democracy) was backed away from during his second term under Sec Rice due to Mubarek push back * Obama has continued and/or expanded Bush's 2nd term Egyptian policy. E.g., wikileaks has some docs advising Sec Clinton to not even mention the name of the candidate that "ran against" Mubarek. Both recent presidents have been interested in an Egyptian succession plan since the peace deal hangs on a friendly leader who supports it. With Mubarek being in his mid 80s both recent Presidents are anxious to get something in place and have been working with Mubarek to do so, which was my point. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:334312 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
