Well, with my opinion of various political figures, I'd probably be the first off the 
list. :)
Ok, ground rule. It is totally acceptable to call into account the words or actions of 
a public figure. If Bush misspells potato, we can jump all over him (verbally, I don't 
want another call from the secret service). On the other hand, the people on this list 
are your friends and family. You might be upset with what someone says, but that does 
not mean you shouldn't be civil. I disagree with Mo but to this day he's still on the 
list. The only time I'll dump someone is if they've gone 'over the line'. I'm not 
going to define what the line is but I think we'll all know it when we see it. 

At 03:24 PM 6/4/02, you wrote:
>Yes, it was a personal attack. But as the President of the United States, 
>he is in the public eye and is often held to a higher standard than most 
>people. Larry was trying to say that he hasn't any respect for Bush's 
>opinion, even though (or especially because) he's our president and yet he 
>could make a mistake like that. It was a side comment, it was his opinion 
>of the President. It was not meant to be a defense of his position.
>
>But the point is, was he attacking someone on this list personally? No. So 
>this is not grounds to throw him off the list.
>
>If we are going to throw people off for stating their opinions of public 
>figures, we're going to have to throw a lot of people off this list. Where 
>do we stop?
>
>Michael, you want to weigh in on this?
>
>Judith
>
>>But that was a Personal Attack... just because Bush is not on the list.
>>
>>When people can not defend their position they attack the person.
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to