No, my entire argument (if you can call it that) was based on Scott saying (paraphrase) that if all goals were as good as this one, and there were more of them, he'd watch football. I said that if his interest is in pretty goals he should watch some of the highlight shows as this was a pretty standard goal. You then had your "America-fuck-yeah" pride bruised that I didn't think that because your team scored a goal in the final minute (also pretty standard in football) that it's one of the most influential goals in football. My argument to that is simply that if you watch more football you'll likely feel the same way.
The fact it's America, and you're American, is what makes it so significant. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:19 PM, G Money <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Medic <hofme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Please point me to where I said context didn't matter. Perhaps I'll just > > bow > > out and you can have this conversation with yourself as it seems you are > > bound, bent and determined to dictate my argument for me. > > Again, I will say, that it may be a great moment in US women's world cup > > history, but it's a pretty standard goal. Just like a three inch tap in > to > > win the Master's isn't "a great putt." > > > > > Your entire argument seems to suggest that context does not matter, since > you are calling this just another header goal..... > > So if context matters, why don't you consider this goal a bit more than > just > a standard header goal???? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:340278 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
