We don't understand how weather works so the debate will never be closed just like we have no idea what the factors are to 100% prevent your house from getting hit by a tornado or burning down.
So we manage the risk with insurance and that's what we should do with GW. We will never know if co2 is causing it, but it might be, so we should knock that shiz off. Sent from my iPad On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "So...the ice isn't melting at an increasing rate? The earth ISN'T getting > hotter? Your article doesn't address these facts." > > It's not my article. Just something I thought was interesting. If it > doesn't address those issues, so what? The earth got hotter and ice was > melting at an increasing rate after the ice age. Unless you want to blame > Atlantis, you really can't blame man made global warming for that. > > I do believe, however, that it shows that the debate is not closed, as many > would have you believe. I particularly like the parts about carbon not > contributing to MMGW, that it is from data collected by NASA, and that it > was peer reviewed (unlike may studies which won't release their data). > > J > > - > > Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation. - > Henry Kissinger > > Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go > out and buy some more tunnel. - John Quinton > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:341072 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
