Maybe it's a dummy. They'll spend years replicating something that doesn't work and we'll be laughing the entire time.
. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was listening to a defense analyst on the way home last night. One > of the things he mentioned is that the drones used in that area are > not the most advanced, so that it was considered an acceptable risk to > lose one or two. As this guy said, it was not a matter of if but when > a drone was lost. > > Of course it could be part of a very perverse idea - "lose" as drone > with tech that's not only old, but containing some other features that > may sabotage the iranian efforts. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Seriously? They cheaped out on self-destruct without considering the >> cost of defending against the drones if the tech fell into empty >> hands? Just how stupid are they? >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Scott Raley <sra...@itc-llc.com> wrote: >>> >>> No not all have self destruct. Some just have code to wipe the storage >>> drive. The one on tv is similar to the one I helped with last year and there >>> was "no money for self destruct" and that would "cause extra weight load". >>> But I didn't say that. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:344438 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
