I'll have to study this a bit, but I see a few errors in how the authors conducted the meta analysis that may invalidate their conclusions.
And yes Sam I do know a bit about the field, so I think I am qualified to respond. On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you read the stupid blog you would have realized it's based on this: > > http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C > > Short link here > http://www.edvul.com/voodoocorr.php > > It's was cited a couple more times then your peer reviewed infallible > study. Because we all know that if it was peer reviewed it is perfect > and there is no arguing with it's findings. > > I'm conflicted > > . > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I detect a blog. A blog, Sam. No input validation at all, yanno? >> Bzzzt. Still SAMMYDONTLIKE IT. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
