On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "It is Zimmerman's fault that kid is dead. " > > At this point, this is not true. Zimmerman is innocent until proven guilty > and he has not even been charged with anything. > > This may change in the future.
Unless the kid grabbed the gun and pulled the trigger himself, it is Zimmerman who fired the shot and therefore his fault that the kid is dead. Justified? Seems unlikely but something radically different than what has been presented so far might come out. > And if you want to use the "Morally" argument, it's still wrong. It's not > a crime or imoral to carry a gun if the proper process has been followed. > There's no proof that he stalked the adolescent. All that exist right now > are a few public facts(skewed liberally by both sides), lots of hearsay, > and emotional profiteers propagating their own narratives (on both sides). There are hard facts (like recordings) that have been made public. Based on those, I cannot see a situation in which it is conceivable to say anything other than Zimmerman stalked him. Now, once he stalked him, it is possible that something went down at the point that the gun became involved and the kid died. What happened in those moments seems far less clear and that is where the areas of doubt seem to be resting. > Be wary of falling into the emotional morass of either side. Wait for the > facts and hope that justice prevails. > > Either way, I think things will turn out extremely bad. I don't see a nice > resolution for this. Agreed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:349178 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
