It seems the judge upheld the law as constitutional, makes sense, but blocked enforcing it for this election because not all voters have photo id's yet.
As for Holder, do as I say not as I do? . On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am neither a proponent nor an opponent of voter id laws. I don't > understand why its such a huge issue that citizens show proof they are > who they say they are when they go to vote. > > However, in order for a voter ID laws to pass the 'smell' test with > me, it needs to have provisions for people who are unable to get an ID > - such as people the left parades around as not having a birth > certificate, etc. - admittedly, fringe cases, but they need to be > accounted for. > > If a voter ID law prevents someone who can currently vote legally (or > even makes it more difficult to vote)..well...then...the law sucks. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:355704 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
