much more reputable than your favourite, World Net Daily. Speaking of which just saw this beauty (a pretty pathetic attempt to remove their competition):
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wnd-columnist-prosecute-liberals-journalists-treason WND Columnist: Prosecute Liberals, Journalists for Treason SUBMITTED BY Brian Tashman on Thursday, 10/25/2012 1:40 pm For years, conservatives have claimed that liberals seek to criminalize Christianity and conservative opinions through imaginary hate speech laws. But today, WorldNetDaily columnist Erik Rush writes that the government should prosecute liberals and members of the press in order to defend freedom, of course. He accuses journalists of treasonous collusion with the Obama administration and said the Founders would have wanted journalists to be found guilty of high crimes. Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, Rush says, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe. He claims that progressives seditious, anti-American speech is excepted from protection under the First Amendment, hoping that the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open. Assuming that all goes well and that we are rid of Obama in January, there will be a nation to repair but what about the causes for this necessity? Yes, many Americans are now cognizant of the fact that progressives have progressed America dangerously close to being a Marxist-socialist nation and that we are collectively responsible for not having checked that progress. But aside from grass-roots efforts toward electoral and political reform, there are other widespread, organized threats to Americas ongoing concern as a representative republic with guaranteed personal liberties, free speech foremost among them. Here, I am speaking of the press, the conglomeration of national broadcast, digital and print media organizations that has been incrementally packed with ideological liberals and socialists, and so has disqualified itself as the impartial government watchdog it once was. During my lifetime, I have seen the press become an advance force for social engineering and global socialism. The degree to which they have deceived Americans and enabled the agenda of radicals in recent decades is beyond shame. As former Democratic pollster Pat Caddell said recently, the press has become an enemy of the American people. In the matter of this president, the press largely facilitated the ascension of Barack Obama. The instances wherein they have promoted, shielded and aided him are beyond enumeration. This goes beyond such things as MSNBCs Chris Matthews and his man crush on Obama Im talking about treasonous collusion. One particularly scandalous incident occurred during the second presidential debate, when CNN moderator Candy Crowley made an interjection that appeared to have been as spontaneous as Ambassador Chris Stevens murder, and which led to a solid point scored for Obama. Most recently, after Mitt Romney brought up Obamas 2009 Apology Tour, the press did their best to support Obamas claim that this never happened, despite boundless reams of footage that exist chronicling the event. It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies. If they had, it is likely that their modus operandi would be similar to that for any faction found guilty of high crimes. Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe. This is not likely to occur, however. Radio personality and nascent media mogul Glenn Beck has the intention of putting the establishment press out of business. While I wish him every success, it doesnt seem likely that he will accomplish this through his organizations alone. In addition to the advent of powerful alternative media sources, I believe it will be necessary to codify or reaffirm the nature of crimes against the Constitution and the American people. In this manner, we can thwart the designs not only of the press, but all global socialists operating in America. Those whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution are, by definition, excepted from protection under the First Amendment (as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment). This is a very important concept to consider, because it is based on these presumptions of protected speech and equal protection for all that progressives and socialists have engaged in their predation upon our liberties. If these truths can be acknowledged and widely accepted as such (as opposed to progressives Orwellian interpretations), then the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open. On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Umm president said on 60 minutes the next day it was a terrorist > attack that was never shown. The admin said it was riots for two > weeks. Nice attempt at spin though. > > > Motherjones? Really? > > . > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/benghazi-libya-state-emails >> >> "Even if the State Department email had been accurate, conservatives >> pounced on it eagerly without underlying corroboration, thereby providing a >> pretty good example of how complicated intelligence analysis can be and why >> it's a bad idea to simply jump on a piece of information that fits your >> preconceived biases. The email was just one piece of information gathered >> in the aftermath of the attack. While the White House's initial explanation >> that the attack had begun as a protest turned out to be wrong, the email >> itself doesn't bear on two of the major remaining questions: what role the >> video played and whether the attack was planned or spontaneous. >> >> You'd think that this would be obvious, but in the future it's a good idea >> to remember that just because someone posts something on Facebook, that >> doesn't necessarily mean it's true. Even better: Just because someone said >> someone posted something on Facebook doesn't mean it's true. Even if you >> really, really want it to be." >> >> >> Simply can't understand why this election race is so close with tomfoolery >> like this forming the basis of the GOP campaign. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356924 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
