"Here is a list of 198 scientific organizations from around the world that have issues statements that their research supports human acceleration of climate change: http://opr.ca.gov/s_listoforganizations.php";
Quite impressive. You site a list that is on a California Government website. I'll ask some questions: Does CA benefit from policies that suppose man made global warming? You betcha. Cabon Taxes. Does CA need money desperately: you Betcha. Then there is the list itself. Did you review some of the entries: The Wildlife Society (international), World Federation of Public Health Associations, Society of American Foresters, American Society of Civil Engineers, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Geological Society of America,Geological Society of Australia,Geological Society of London, etc. Really? You are going to count these as valid supporters? By that standard, the NRA is a valid supporter of the view that there is no global warming. On the list are a large number of "official" scientific institutes: Uganda National Academy of Sciences, Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences, Academy of Science of Mozambique, Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominican,Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela, Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico, Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia, Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru, etc. Really? These countries can't figure out how to grow crops to feed their people and yet they count as valid supporters of MMGW. If foreign aid depended on not supporting MMGW, they would switch in a moment. You should read the following article based on wiki-leaks documents: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/dec/03/wikileaks-us-manipulated-climate-accord Hidden behind the save-the-world rhetoric of the global climate changenegotiations lies the mucky realpolitik: money and threats buy political support; spying and cyberwarfare are used to seek out leverage. The US diplomatic cables reveal how the US seeks dirt on nations opposed to its approach to tackling global warming; how financial and other aid is used by countries to gain political backing; how distrust, broken promises and creative accounting dog negotiations; and how the US mounted a secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm opposition to the controversial "Copenhagen accord", the unofficial document that emerged from the ruins of the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009. Finally, you have the blatantly political groups supporting this farce: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, World Health Organization, United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS), etc. On the whole, the list useless. "Again, I don't care if you wish to hold a contrary position, Jerry, I really don't. " That's mighty white of you. "Just please deal honestly with me...and admit that at the present time, you do not have the majority of the scientific community on your side. " If you want honesty, start with yourself. I cannot be honest with you by stating that there is a scientific consensus supporting global warming, let alone man made global warming. J - Protection of the environment has become the principal tool for attack against the West and all it stands for. Protection of the environment may be used as a pretext to adopt a series of measures designed to undermine the industrial base of developed nations. It may also serve to introduce malaise by lowering their standard of living and implanting communist values. - Natalie Grant Wraga ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362680 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
