Blindly, yes. You also said obviously intoxicated. That's different. This has been about check points up until now. Obviously if you're weaving and all over they should be able to stop you. Visible evidence should be allowed to be collected but no breathalyzer without consent. On Jul 8, 2013 9:03 AM, "Cameron Childress" <camer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:59 AM, LRS Scout wrote: > > > If an arrest is effected, in this case for attempted murder. At that > point > > there are multiple victims and witness. > > > > The investigation and warrants produced from that lead to the questions > > and the documents. > > > So, you don't have to hit someone with a bullet for a crime to > have occurred, but you do have to hit them with a car for a crime to > have occurred. In my opinion, driving a car on a crowded road while > severely intoxicated is equivalent to blindly firing a gun into a crowd. > > -Cameron > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365269 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
