All the polls say that the US is in favour of a new healthcare plan. The reports are saying that the costs are actually lower than what were first projected.
You think what the GOP is doing is the right way to go about it? So if a Republican wins and decides to pass a bill that the Democrats don't agree with, you agree that shutting down the US indefinitely should be an accepted form of politics? Or is it just this time, because it's the republicans and because it's for something that you agree with? On 2 October 2013 07:39, Bruce Sorge <sor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This bill was shoved down our throat. There is a large segment of the > population that never wanted it, but those in Capitol Hill don't really > care what we want. They only care what they want. The only time they really > care what we the people want is when it's re-election time, which is coming > up soon. And then they only make empty promises. Even that wretched whore > Pelosi said that we have to pass obamacare to see what's in obamacare. > Really? Since when do we pass a law on something that we really don't know > the contents of? I have not personally met one single person who was for > this, not one. I know of some people who are for it, but I have not met > them personally. Of course I have the luxury of complaining about this > because I will never have to sign up for Obamacare. But that does not mean > that I don't care about family members who might have to, but don't want to. > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Why should the Democrats not fund the plan that they put in place? > > This plan was voted for, it was agreed upon and it has stood up to all > the > > normal challenges that the GOP could bring against it. > > > > Why does the GOP feel it has the right to shut down a country, and affect > > the entire worlds economic markets, because it did not get what it > wanted? > > They LOST the elections. Someone else gets to lead the country until the > > next elections. Deal with it. > > > > This isn't both sides. It is one side that is forcing an issue no matter > > what the costs are. Since when has raising the debt ceiling been an open > > point of negotiation? And what party was the last party to use it as > such? > > Think about it. > > > > The playground is burning, and you have two taps to turn . The GOP says > > give me what I want, what I have not been able to get through any other > > means, or I will not turn this tap. The playground is burning. > > > > Is that what you refer to as "negotiation" ? > > > > It is blackmail! And the segment of the population that seems satisfied > to > > sit in the flames and nod their heads is equally baffling to me. Can you > > think of the impact this can have on the bond and investment markets? > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367481 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
