>>no one (even the pro-choice) folks can deny life begins
>>at contraception.

contraception? Conception.  Or you were deliberately making a point?


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:56 PM
>>To: CF-Community
>>Subject: RE: Abortion (was CNN Breaking News)
>>
>>> My message for the pro life:
>>>
>>>     We are talking about LAW.  You cannot legislate you
>>> personal morality, as
>>> it is not the countries communal morality.  If you prove life
>>
>>How do you know that? If we had a nation wide vote today, would people
>>vote to allow or disallow arbortion? Let's face it - all laws come down
>>to morality. The issue is when a minority group tries to impose it's
>>morality on the majority. If I had to guess, I'd say there is a strong
>>chance abortion would be outlawed it put to a nation wide vote. (That's
>>assuming that everyone would actually get off their rear and vote. ;)
>>
>>> starts at
>>> conception I will support you beyond reproach.  Until then
>>> fight it as a
>>> constitutional issue, states rights.
>>
>>Being anal - but no one (even the pro-choice) folks can deny life begins
>>at contraception. If the thing is alive - then it's life. The issue is
>>when the 'soul' is ... I don't know... attached? Not a great word, but
>>you get the idea. As someone who is pro-life, I feel that we shouldn't
>>risk it. It seems silly to think there isn't a soul until it 'pops' out
>>- but until we are sure - why take the chance?
>>
>>p.s. Just so you know, I am pro-life as well - I just feel that the
>>comments above needed further thought. ;)
>>
>>-ray
>>
>>
>>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to