or "is" ;-) > depends on your definition of alive > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephenie Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: Abortion (was CNN Breaking News) > > > > But is it not still alive? Viable on its own is a different story....but > > alive nontheless > > > > ~~ > > Stephenie > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:14 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Abortion (was CNN Breaking News) > > > > > > I can deny life begins at conception and I can do it with logic. Can the > > collection of cells live outside of the mother? If the answer is no, > > then its not life but the potential for life. Until the fetus can exist > > on its own, it's not alive but is actually a part of the mothers body. A > > parasite that may become a person. > > My personal views on this are as complex as anyone else's. The above is > > just a bit of logic. > > > > > Being anal - but no one (even the pro-choice) folks can deny life > > > begins at contraception. If the thing is alive - then it's life. The > > > issue is when the 'soul' is ... I don't know... attached? Not a great > > > word, but you get the idea. As someone who is pro-life, I feel that we > > > > > shouldn't risk it. It seems silly to think there isn't a soul until it > > > > > 'pops' out > > > - but until we are sure - why take the chance? > > > > > > p.s. Just so you know, I am pro-life as well - I just feel that the > > > comments above needed further thought. ;) > > > > > > -ray > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
