I've played American army and try as I may, I can't get into sniper school. And from my record of being killed regularly in the game, I'll never have military training. So that removes me as the sniper from the skill perspective. As for the card, those who use Tarot (I don't) know that the death card is used to denote change rather than death. Someone who is knowledgeable of Tarot would use the Chariot, Strength, or one of the sword cards. The death card is used by those with no knowledge other than being able to read. This means you can remove the 'hes into mysticism' from his profile. On the other hand, the weird or RPG part of the profile can still stand, but I'd doubt it. Now that's all besides the point. If the card is from the shooter then he's a step away from being caught. Once a serial killer starts taunting the police, the chances of him making a mistake on subsequent attacks are much higher.
> Just saw on the USA Today site this description of the D.C. area sniper: > > 'Robert Ressler, a retired FBI profiler, says the card could be a prank. But > if the sniper left the card, Ressler said, it could indicate that the sniper > is "into weird mysticism. If he's into tarot cards, he's into mysticism and > possibly (the role-playing game) Dungeons & Dragons. He's into being > fascinated with the unusual."' > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-10-09-sniper-evidence_x.htm > > Now we all know Michael is into the occult. He's said so himself. So that > obviously makes him the sniper in this case, eh? (I'm guessing that he's > not.) > > Same situation with the other books at Amazon. There is not a direct causal > relationship to the reading material. > > Kevin Graeme > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:47 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Pedophiliac book on Amazon.com > > > > > > Also, how about books on How To Rape Women and Not Get Caught...Cheating > > Your Spouse 101 (there is a book like that, in fact), How to Beat > > Your Wife > > into Submission, Terrorist Guide: How To Sneak Bombs Pass > > Security and Blow > > Up Very Large Buildings, Ethnic Cleansing Guide: How to exterminate filthy > > ::insert plural racial derogatory here::, Father's Guide: Maintain Sexual > > Relationship with your Daughter and keep the Wife from knowing!. > > > > Sorry for being a little rough, but I was trying to make a point. > > > > See Beth, as much as I agree with you on Freedom of speech, these possible > > book subjects make me feel uneasy! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Beth F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:59 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Pedophiliac book on Amazon.com > > > > > > > > I saw this on some newsgroup and at first I was outraged. But then I > > realized sometimes you read books to learn about something - not because > > you agree with the content. For example, wouldn't a cop running internet > > stings to stop online pedophiles from preying on kids want to read this > > book? What if I wanted to learn about pedophiles? Wouldn't a > > book written > > by one who thinks its jusitified be worthy of reading? > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Phoeun Pha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:01 AM > > Subject: Pedophiliac book on Amazon.com > > > > > > > Hey guys, I saw this story on Oreilly fox news. > > > > > > Apparently they are selling books buy this group or individual that is > > about > > > homosexual love with little boys. Here's quote.. > > > "The book says that men who sexually pursue young boys are not > > bad people, > > > but, "loving human beings." > > > > > > Amazon says that it carries the book because of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, but > > this > > > book obviously encourages "criminal" action. > > > > > > What do you guys think? Should Amazon keep this book in their database > > and > > > protect freedom of speech? Or is there a fine line between freedom of > > > speech and moral/ethical responsibility? > > > > > > Personally, I believe that taking Freedom of speech to the extreme is as > > bad > > > as religious fanaticism. > > > > > > > > > Please read the wole thing below. > > > here's the link to the Fox news Oreilly site story > > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64473,00.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
