If we follow your line of reasoning on DNA evidence then shouldn't we also outlaw fingerprinting, or speaking (voice prints from tapes) or anything else? I think DNA evidence is the greatest innovation to criminal investigations in the past 100 years. hell, it can even help wrongly convicted people get out of prison.
Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:13 PM Subject: RE: How free are we? > Ok, > I reread my earlier post and I guess I need to be more obvious in my attempts at >humor. > > I am not anti-ACLU or privacy rights or any other type of rights. I am a >libertarian, don't confuse my stance on firearms with membership or agreement with the republicans and their conservative views. I like all ten of our initial amendments just fine, and I defend them all. Hell, I think that dna evidence should be banned because you are in essence making a defendant testify against themselves (unless you can get the sample through other legal means, like searching their trash or what have you). > > Tim > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_community Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
