The article I read said the agent's lawyers were looking into whether there were 
mechanical problems with the  two dead people's car.  (yeah, right!)  If they were not 
killed by the agent, then they weren't his "victims", so therefore they are his 
alleged victims.  Unfortunately I can see their logic in using this ... CYA is SOP ... 
;)

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Protesters


At 12:16 PM 11/27/02, William wrote:
>remember the news back when one of the people that was alleged of a crime
>sued a news station and i dont remember if he won or not but ever since its
>been ALLEGED nobody wants to get sued
>-

Yeah, I can understand using it to describe the 'alleged' perp. But this 
headline

Alleged Victims' Mother Testifies In Former FBI Agent's Trial

isn't talking about the perp.  Depending on how you read the mangled 
grammar it is either talking about the mother or the victims.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to