Interesting? Yes. Right? No. Driving a car on the government roads is a privilege, driving my car on my land is a right.
Brandishing a firearm on the government roads is illegal, doing it on my land, well that's illegal also, unless I am threatened with force. If I live out in the country where hunting is legal, then I can do that. What business does the government have there? Not everybody needs assault rifles, just me and the people who think exactly the same way I do. :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:14 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Poll was(RE: Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban) > > The second amendment was not written to mean that individuals have a right > to own a weapon...certainly not an assault > weapon. > > Here's an interesting article: > > http://www.corporatemofo.com/stories/021208guns.htm > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Timothy Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:25 AM > Subject: RE: Poll was(RE: Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban) > > > > Larry, > > The only thing I would ask is this: > > > > How is the 1st amendment an individual right, but the second is not? > > > > That's all I want to know. Because as far as I am concerned without the > 2nd, you have no guarantee for the first. > > > > Tim > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
