In other words you have no sustance to your argument.  That's fine I
understand.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maureen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us


> You know what, Kevin, I'm going to practice what I preach and refuse to
> argue with you about this.  I posted something that reflected my opinion
> and based on the overwhelming turnout for the peace marches today, the
> opinion of millions of other people.  So I'm going to bask in peace and
> quiet, and the joy of knowing that free speech is not dead, and people can
> still make a difference.
>
> At 07:53 PM 2/15/03, Kevin wrote:
> >And what do you think his motive is?  If you say Oil, you lose
credibility,
> >is you drudge out the "He tried to kill my daddy" argument, you lose even
> >more.  Is it possible he wants to do what Clinton wouldn't?  Clinton
> >certainly spoke strong words about Saddam, Bush is saying the same
things,
> >only he is backing his words with actions.
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to