no, it doesn't prove it though it would fit the facts. As would someone saying well we better watch what we try to get away with. I haven't lept to any conclusions, personally, just think it's suspicious as hell...
Dana Nick McClure writes: > But it proves that there was a bid process, which some on this list > disputed. And any sub-contracts would be awarded by the contract winner, > not the government. > > My point here is that many people jump to conclusions without getting all > the facts first. > > At 03:55 PM 3/29/2003 +0000, you wrote: > >"Halliburton, which declined to comment, could still be awarded a > >sub-contractor role.....Halliburton has won one Iraq-related job. The > >company's Kellogg Brown & Root unit this week was awarded a contract by the > >U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to put out oil fires and make emergency > >repairs to Iraq's oil infrastructure. Halliburton wouldn't speculate about > >the deal's monetary value. " > > > >Still I suppose it's good they are nto going to get the whole enchilada... > > > > > >Nick McClure writes: > > > > > http://money.cnn.com/2003/03/28/news/companies/Halliburton/index.htm > > > > > > Halliburton is out of the running for the main contract to rebuild Iraq. > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
