Before I forget, here's the Canadian military's report on the incident. I 
have not located the recommendations of the Air Force board yet.

larry

At 11:25 AM 4/2/2003, you wrote:
>I have to back Larry on this one (it's the end of the world as we know
>it.........)
>
>Those guys seriously f-ed up.  Their commanders stepped on it too.
>
>Tim
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:18 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: FW: An apology to the U.S.......
>
>
>How about wanton disregard for orders. They were ordered not to launch. The
>location was not a combat area, it was a fricking training area for pity's
>sake. The pilot who launched the JDAMS was a john wayne type. He ignored 2
>separate orders to checkfire.
>
>Ordinary incident of friendly fire can almost be understandable the wrong
>guy at point X at the wrong time. I read the available reports from both
>the investigations - US and Canadian. There were many egregious errors in
>the Command and Control System. It isn't a matter of whining, its a matter
>of being pissed off at the imcompetence of it.
>
>larry
>
>At 10:30 AM 4/2/2003, you wrote:
> >ok this is one thing I am annoyed at the whiney ass people who whine when
>FF
> >happens.
> >
> >Listen its combat its a mistake it happens you don't throw two good people
> >in jail because of it. If 2 Canadians did the same things to Americans we
> >would probably cry out and do the same thing. But its not right...combat is
> >combat it happens it sucks move on. Unless you do what that 101st prick did
> >to his own unit or if he did it to friendlies like the UK etc, then its an
> >accident that's terrible. Its a system fault not a personal fault, just
>like
> >medical mistakes, the majority are faulty system not faulty people. Fix the
> >problems with whatever system let a FF incident happen and quit the gosh
> >darned bitching and complaining about it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:23 AM
> >Subject: Re: FW: An apology to the U.S.......
> >
> >
> >It it then my what are those ships doing in the Gulf and the Red Sea? Mmy
> >my my, they must be on a long pleasure cruise, stopping and searching all
> >those nasty middle eastern ship for tickles and grins. Similarly those
> >Canadian soldier must just be on a long extended hike in Afghanistan. Just
> >like those ones that got bombed by those 2 incompetent pilots.
> >
> >Yessiree all those soldiers, sailors etc just off on a long vacation.
> >
> >Pardon my sarcasm as a  whole but your response merited it.
> >
> >At 09:46 AM 4/2/2003, you wrote:
> > >Larry, that is BS.
> > >
> > >Canada as a whole, and the elected Gov in particular, have been _very_
> > >clear in their feelings and participation in this war.
> > >
> > >If they could (in their own good concience) let us hang by withdrawing
> > >their forces in these other areas, I think they would.
> > >
> > >They are _not_ participating in this war.
> > >
> > >Unless you are saying that this war = the war on terrorism, then
>obviously
> > >the Canadians are helping in that bigger war.
> > >
> > >But at least they are not (like the French and Germans) actively opposing
> > >us in this war.
> > >
> > >Just my opinion,
> > >Jerry Johnson
> > >
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/03 08:45AM >>>
> > >Typically Canadian but very apt.
> > >
> > >One point that has been pissing me off. I'm hearing whiny complaints by
> > >various people in the area about Canada's participation in the Iraqi War.
> > >Yes Canadian forces as a whole are not participating. However to set the
> > >record straight, there are 7 ships from the Canadian navy in the region
> > >(the Red Sea and the Gulf) participating in the anti-terrorism patrols -
> > >freeing up US navy assets btw. There is also  another Canadian battalion
>is
> > >heading over to Afghanistan, while special operations units, such as the
> > >JTF2 are also working with US forces in that theater.
> > >
> > >So do me a favour, cut the bs about Canada's non-participation.
> > >
> > >larry
> > >
> > >At 05:11 AM 4/2/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> > > >Cute. Very cute.
> > > >And quite smug.
> > > >I enjoyed it, even while feeling insulted.
> > > >:-)
> > > >
> > > >-Ben
> > > >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >Came across this today, written by Rick Mercer:
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >On behalf of Canadians everywhere I'd like to offer an apology
>to
> > > > > >  >the United States of America. We haven't been getting along very
> > > > > >  >well recently and for that, I am truly sorry.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >I'm sorry we called George Bush a moron. He is a moron but, it
> > > > > >  >wasn't nice of us to point it out. If it's any consolation, the
> >fact
> > > > > >  >that he's a moron shouldn't reflect poorly on the people of
> >America.
> > > > > >  >After all it's not like you actually elected him.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >I'm sorry about our softwood lumber. Just because we have more
> >trees
> > > > > >  >than you doesn't give us the right to sell you lumber that's
> >cheaper
> > > > > >  >and better than your own.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >I'm sorry we beat you in Olympic hockey. In our defense I guess
> >our
> > > > > >  >excuse would be that our teams were much, much, much, much
>better
> > > > > >  >than yours.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >I'm sorry we burnt down your white house during the war of 1812.
>I
> > > > > >  >notice you've rebuilt it! It's Very Nice. I'm sorry about your
> > > > > >  >beer. I know we had nothing to do with your beer but, we Feel
>your
> > > > > >  >Pain.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean, when you're going
> > > > > >  >up against a crazed dictator, you wanna have your friends by
>your
> > > > > >  >side. I realize it took more than two years before you guys
> >pitched
> > > > > >  >in against Hitler, But that was different. Everyone knew he had
> > > > > >  >weapons.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >And finally on behalf of all Canadians, I'm sorry that we
> > > > > >  >are constantly apologizing for things in a passive aggressive
>way
> > > > > >  >which is really a thinly veiled criticism. I sincerely hope that
> > > > > >  >you're not upset over this. We've seen what you do to countries
> >you
> > > > > >  >get upset with.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >Thank you.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89
70.5
                                

Reply via email to