Yes you are crazy, because then the choice is not to go to ALL restaurants.

There is a rant here about non-smokers holding a gun to the head of owners
to get a non-smoking restaurant.  What about the smoking-gun smokers hold on
a us non-smokers.  One smoker in a restaurant can fill up the whole place.
So all us 45 non-smokers just have to get up and leave.  Why is his right to
smoke more important then my right NOT to smoke.  Why do I have to leave,
why can't the smoker leave.

I have not heard of one bar and/or restaurant that has gone out of business
from the ban on smoking here in CA.  Guess what, many smokers can put their
habit on hold for an hour to eat out.    I have yet to figure out how to
hold my breath for the same time period.

As you might guess, I'm pro non-smoking in public places.  Because the
smoker isn't the only one smoking in this situation.

Ok, I'll stop venting now.

Now, you are perfectly free to smoke in private, and there are restaurants
and bars left in CA that do allow smoking by following the rules necessary
to do so.  So go there.  And let me have a smoke free place to enjoy my
pasta primavera.

--------------
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to