So the state doesn't need a warrant to search your home? The state can block your free speech and practice of religion? Why is this right any different?
Tim -----Original Message----- From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:06 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: US Citizenship Test My personal interpretation is this: The Federal Government will not put restrictions on weapons owned by the people. The states however may place restrictions. > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 8:57 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: US Citizenship Test > > That's more of a collective right than an individual one. The first clause > and second clauses supercedes the third. The interpretation of the courts > has been for over the last 150 years or so that its been a societal right > rather than an individual one. > > larry > > At 07:47 AM 7/7/2003 -0400, Heald, Tim wrote: > >So to extend your own argument, Dana, why then is the right to keep and > bear > >arms not an individual right? > > > >"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free > state, > >the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." > > > >Tim > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
