I think I saw something about this when I dug up some studies on smoking
before but I don't have time to go there right now and probably won't soon.
I am behind on about three projects. Might be time to turn email off and
get to it come to think of it. But maybe somebody does know what's going
on; it just ain't me and I don't think it's the author of that CNN piece...

Dana

Angel Stewart writes:

> Well....I'm assuming that the statistics are correct with my analysis of
> the situation and what it "says about non-smokers".
> 
> If the article is incorrect and exaggerated then no one really knows
> what's going on and the initial argument is moot.
> 
> -Gel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> I find the statistics rather suspect. When I see things like "as much
> as" 20 to 50 percent, I think fudge factor. "As much as" means that this
> is an example of a high number. I smell industry press release. At best
> this is anecdotal.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> That doesn't say anything about non smokers it simply says the smokers
> are going where they can still pollute the air thats all.
> 
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to