fine, hell i think FDR with his 4 elected terms is pretty damn nice. If
a president starts to abuse his power too much he can/will be impeached.
*Shrugs* We did fine with no term limits for 100+ years so i think we
would be ok with it. It would have been awesome, because clinton would
have won AGAIN vs bush and that sure as hell would have been a big
signal to get over it stop wasting our tax dollars on a witch hunt and
lets get to the business of healing our country. As well as keeping our
economy strong keeping our budget balanced and what not. And i'm very
seriously all for the president having as many ho's as he needs to keep
himself well oiled if you get my drift. I don't want a president with
the sexual tension of a catholic priest. It makes me nervous with his
hands so close to the button.
But i'm way not for letting unnatural born citizens run the country, its
a bad idea, i mean at one point we were all non-natural. Its awesome
people can come here and get into congress or become a governor but the
top spot should be reserved. Though you could always become the speaker
of the house or vice president (i dont know if there is a restriction of
natural only for vps) so those are a couple ways arnold could become
president. Then you just take out the people in the line of succession
and you take over kinda like in Shanghi Knights. Aren't you 13th in the
line for the crown?? LOL good stuff
--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:21 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
That's my postition as well... I like Clark, a lot, although I do know
that we don't agree on all of the issues. I'm mostly concerned that we
elect an administration that looks to benefit the people rather than
itself.
<sigh> We really should just amend the Constitution to let Bill run
again... maybe if we offered to also amend it to let Arnold run for
Pres we could have the most amazing race in history - Clinton vs. the
Prezinator.
- Matt Small
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
I think in this case the Democrats are going to have to be very
pragmatic
and go for whomever is most likely to beat Shrub. As much as I agree
with
certain policy positions, I think that Clark has a better chance than
Kucinich. Perhaps a Clark Dean combination would work.
larry
At 10:08 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
>Those are also my first two choices, Larry. But on the thrid I go
for
>John Edwards. I'm a democrat all the way up til 9, then it's a
>Libertarian Candidate.
>
>- Matt Small
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
>
> At 05:51 PM 10/29/2003, you wrote:
> >I'm sure this came up either in 2002 or 2000 as well, but it's
> >SelectSmart's candidate matcher. You choose your position, it
gives you
> >a candidate.
> >
>
><http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/>http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/
> >
> >I'm a 100% match to an undeclared Green Party candidate, 93%
match to
> >Dean. :-/
>
> Not sure I agree with all the questions and how they were set up
for
> priorities, but here's my scores:
>
> 1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH -
> Democrat (100%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Kucinich.html>Click
> here for info
> 2. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT -
> Democrat (92%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Dean.html>Click here
> for info
> 3. Kerry, Senator John, MA -
> Democrat (85%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Kerry.html>Click here
> for info
> 4. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL -
> Democrat (83%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Moseley-Braun.html>Click here
for info
> 5. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO -
> Democrat (80%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Gephardt.html>Click
> here for info
> 6. Edwards, Senator John, NC -
> Democrat (79%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Edwards.html>Click
> here
> for info
> 7. Lieberman Senator Joe CT -
> Democrat (77%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Lieberman.html>Click
> here for info
> 8. Sharpton, Reverend Al -
> Democrat (73%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Sharpton.html>Click
> here for info
> 9. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. -
> Democrat (54%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/LaRouche.html>Click
> here for info
> 10. Clark, Retired Army General Wesley K "Wes" Arkansas -
> Democrat (53%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Clark.html>Click
> here for
>
> I strongly disagree with Lyndon LaRouche's policies, and more
strongly
> agree with Clarke's.
>
> larry
>
>
>----------
>[
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
