corporate sponsors out. Both lied about foreign affairs (china for Clinton,
other stuff for bush). Both have had shady financial dealings, whitewater,
and some Texas oil baron stuff.
And realistically they have both made us less free.
Time for a change.
Timothy Heald
Information Systems Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:05 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
It would be interesting to say the least, lines of coke against lining up
the interns.
lying about Iraq vs lying about interns.
go figure. What Clinton was doing to an intern, shrub is trying to do to
the country.
larry
At 10:26 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
>Orrin Hatch (and a couple of others) put forth an amendment to the
>Constitution a few months ago that addresses just that situation -
>letting a president serve as long as (s)he can be re-elected.
>Obviously, Hatch brought that up as the side-product of some fantasy of
>having Dubya in office indefinitely. He apparently didn't think that if
>the amendment were to pass, the Shrub would have to run against Clinton,
>which would be... fun.
>
>- Jim
>
>Matthew Small wrote:
>
> >That's my postition as well... I like Clark, a lot, although I do know
> that we don't agree on all of the issues. I'm mostly concerned that we
> elect an administration that looks to benefit the people rather than
itself.
> >
> ><sigh> We really should just amend the Constitution to let Bill run
> again... maybe if we offered to also amend it to let Arnold run for Pres
> we could have the most amazing race in history - Clinton vs. the
Prezinator.
> >
> >- Matt Small
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Larry C. Lyons
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
> >
> >
> > I think in this case the Democrats are going to have to be very
pragmatic
> > and go for whomever is most likely to beat Shrub. As much as I agree
with
> > certain policy positions, I think that Clark has a better chance than
> > Kucinich. Perhaps a Clark Dean combination would work.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > At 10:08 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
> > >Those are also my first two choices, Larry. But on the thrid I go for
> > >John Edwards. I'm a democrat all the way up til 9, then it's a
> > >Libertarian Candidate.
> > >
> > >- Matt Small
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Larry C. Lyons
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:01 PM
> > > Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
> > >
> > > At 05:51 PM 10/29/2003, you wrote:
> > > >I'm sure this came up either in 2002 or 2000 as well, but it's
> > > >SelectSmart's candidate matcher. You choose your position, it
> gives you
> > > >a candidate.
> > > >
> > >
><http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/>http://selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/
> > > >
> > > >I'm a 100% match to an undeclared Green Party candidate, 93% match
to
> > > >Dean. :-/
> > >
> > > Not sure I agree with all the questions and how they were set up
for
> > > priorities, but here's my scores:
> > >
> > > 1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH -
> > > Democrat (100%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Kucinich.html>Click
> > > here for info
> > > 2. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT -
> > > Democrat (92%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Dean.html>Click here
> > > for info
> > > 3. Kerry, Senator John, MA -
> > > Democrat (85%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Kerry.html>Click here
> > > for info
> > > 4. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL -
> > > Democrat (83%)
> > > <http://selectsmart.com/president/Moseley-Braun.html>Click here
> for info
> > > 5. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO -
> > > Democrat (80%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Gephardt.html>Click
> > > here for info
> > > 6. Edwards, Senator John, NC -
> > > Democrat (79%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Edwards.html>Click
> > > here
> > > for info
> > > 7. Lieberman Senator Joe CT -
> > > Democrat (77%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Lieberman.html>Click
> > > here for info
> > > 8. Sharpton, Reverend Al -
> > > Democrat (73%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/Sharpton.html>Click
> > > here for info
> > > 9. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. -
> > > Democrat (54%)
> <http://selectsmart.com/president/LaRouche.html>Click
> > > here for info
> > > 10. Clark, Retired Army General Wesley K "Wes" Arkansas -
> > > Democrat (53%)
<http://selectsmart.com/president/Clark.html>Click
> > > here for
> > >
> > > I strongly disagree with Lyndon LaRouche's policies, and more
strongly
> > > agree with Clarke's.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >[
> >
> >
>
>----------
>[
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
