I can never decide if Bush does more than read the script. I suspect not. I grant you that *Bush* himself may not have known otherwise, but I think the administration as an organization did know otherwise and chose to proceed anyway despite that knowledge.

Dana

>Bush's team majorly F*&^ed up on the yellow cake, and Bush was not enough into
>the details to challenge.  Mistake versus intentional deception.  One one is
>going to deceive on something like that which was clearly documented as false.
>That mistake was always going to get caught.
>
>And No.  I don't think we will find any.  The deception, however,was on the
>part of Sadaam and it didn't go the way he wanted.  He fooled everyone.
>Again,if all of the intelligence points to him having them and he takes
>actions that support this view, then it is his fault, not ours.
>
>Andy
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:04 AM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: Re:Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
>
>  Old news or not it was deception and in the State of the Union speech at
>that. Do you honestly still think they are going to find actual weapons of
>mass destruction out there somewhere?
>
>  Dana
>
>  >Yellow cake is old news.  Clearly a f*&%-up.
>  >
>  >WMD, again, NO ONE SAID THEY DIDN'T EXIST.  Not even you.  So lets move one
>on
>  >that one.
>  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:15 PM
>  >  To: CF-Community
>  >  Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>  >
>  >
>  >  At 12:12 PM 12/14/2003, you wrote:
>  >  >I don't see where / how he deceived us
>  >  >and I certainly don't agree to the no purpose thing.  Latest polls from
>  >Iraq
>  >  >support my view(only on throwing the bum out).
>  >
>  >  What about the supposed Weapons of Mass Destruction or attempts to buy
>  >  yellowcake Uranium that was shown to be faked, and the administration
>knew
>  >  of it before the State of the Union address, isn't that deception.
>  >
>  >  larry
>  >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to