large amount of abuse without jamming. And given the larger round (7.62mm vs
5.56mm) it produced some impressive results.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:58 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Assault Weapons Ban
>
>
> I have an AR-15 that was manufactured in 1988, the things are
> more trouble than they are worth.
>
> The breach has a tendency to scrape and (short of hiring
> someone to do some precision engineering) this is a
> non-correctable problem that will lead to jams over time.
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:52 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Assault Weapons Ban
>
>
> Yeah the reporting is very badly worded. What I am getting
> is that they attached the "gun show loophole" and Assault
> Weapons Ban as riders to a bill that would protect gun
> manufacturers from litigation. These things being added
> caused enough members to vote against the bill.
>
> Looks like I will be able to get cheap AKs again soon. Hell
> might even be able to afford an AR-15 if the prices come back
> down to 1994 prices.
>
> yay!!!!
>
> Tim
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
