anybody else? I've got a pitch to make (or more accurately...i've got to
decide whether or not i've got a pitch to make) :)
Thx,
Charlie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lyons, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:16 AM
Subject: RE: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> The component browser is worth the upgrade, as well as the CSS support.
The
> coding environment has substantially improved. Application speed seems to
be
> improved as well.
>
> larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:12 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> >
> >
> > Our team (3 developers) currently uses Studio MX
> > (predominatnly DWMX...not so much even Flash or Fireworks).
> >
> > One of the group has made a request (direct to the boss) for
> > an upgrade to Studio MX 2004, citing "better support for CSS,
> > stability, speed, and easier connectivity between CF and Flash".
> >
> > Now the boss wants my input on a justification for upgrade.
> >
> > Personally, I don't even use DW (still on HS+). But I do
> > plan on forcing myself to migrate over (2 out of 3 on the
> > team use Dreamweaver...and we really do want to standardize
> > on one development environment...so DW wins).
> >
> > I'm hoping to hear from those who have used both DWMX and
> > DWMX 2004. Any significant reasons for upgrading?
> >
> > Appreciate any feedback I can get.
> >
> > Tx,
> > Charlie
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
