Yeah...I wanted to avoid the propaganda and hear the truth : )
Everything on MM's site sounds good (ie improved speed, stability, the
component browser, the css support, the live debugging panel, xml
support)...but hearing from people who've actually played with these toys is
much more valuable than parroting what's on the site.
Big boss doesn't so much want to know what is new as much as he wants to
know why/how the new features will turn us into a lean, mean, clean code
producing team of CF animals.
So if anybody can say, "the live debugging panel has siginificantly reduced
the time it takes me to debug my applications" or "the component browser has
allowed me to churn out 1000 components a day versus the 3 per week I used
to average"...that'd be a big help : )
Thx,
Charlie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lyons, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> Charlie,
>
> You could start with the Macromedia propaganda:
>
>
http://www.macromedia.com/software/studio/productinfo/features/brz_tour/?pro
> moid=product_studio_ondemand_tour_092603
>
> And for those who prefer shorter links
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?D248131D7
>
> larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 1:08 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> >
> >
> > appreciate the feedback Larry.
> >
> > anybody else? I've got a pitch to make (or more
> > accurately...i've got to decide whether or not i've got a
> > pitch to make) :)
> >
> > Thx,
> > Charlie
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lyons, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:16 AM
> > Subject: RE: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> >
> >
> > > The component browser is worth the upgrade, as well as the CSS
> > > support.
> > The
> > > coding environment has substantially improved. Application
> > speed seems
> > > to
> > be
> > > improved as well.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:12 AM
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Subject: StudioMX vs StudioMX 2004
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Our team (3 developers) currently uses Studio MX (predominatnly
> > > > DWMX...not so much even Flash or Fireworks).
> > > >
> > > > One of the group has made a request (direct to the boss) for an
> > > > upgrade to Studio MX 2004, citing "better support for CSS,
> > > > stability, speed, and easier connectivity between CF and Flash".
> > > >
> > > > Now the boss wants my input on a justification for upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I don't even use DW (still on HS+). But I do plan on
> > > > forcing myself to migrate over (2 out of 3 on the team use
> > > > Dreamweaver...and we really do want to standardize on one
> > > > development environment...so DW wins).
> > > >
> > > > I'm hoping to hear from those who have used both DWMX and
> > DWMX 2004.
> > > > Any significant reasons for upgrading?
> > > >
> > > > Appreciate any feedback I can get.
> > > >
> > > > Tx,
> > > > Charlie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
