And it wasn't only the US at fault. It was the entire security council.
I picked the US because of the Iraq situation and the recent statements
on the list that a large part of the reason was Morality.
I thought it hypocritical because it was basically saying one thing, and
doing (or not doing) another.
I'm sure if we investigated Rwanda and the lack of interest there
further the conclusions we may draw would be far more alarming than to
just call it 'hypocritical'.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug White
That would be like substituting a misdemeanor for a felony.
Had we not gone into Iraq, what would have happened to Vice-President
Cheney's
"shadow government?" How would Halliburton make all that money? and ad
infinitum. Why didn't we go into Saudi Arabia, or Syria the REAL
sources of the
terrorists and their financing? Not to mention Egypt and Iran.
The issue was not saving people, it was saving face for the Ex-former
Pres bush
& minions who still had egg on their faces.
The French have always had interests in Africa, why did they not go in?
Why
didn't China go in?
Why didn't Rwanda's neighbors go in?
So in your mind the whole burden should be shouldered by the US? or is
this a
back-door way of saying that you agree with me that the Iraq deal was a
farce to
begin with, and that the incumbent administration should be held
criminally
responsible for their misrepresentations, lies and miscellaneous
cheating?
But hypocrisy it is not - the whole deal smells much fouler than that.
--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.7.1 - Release Date: 4/6/2004
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
