>> So does CF, but it's still not ADO.NET.

Back this up with your reasoning....also if you wouldn't run Windows how are you going to run .NET....? curious...



Nathan Strutz wrote:

>Comments inline...
>
>Viktors Rotanovs wrote:
>
>  
>
>>PHP also runs on Windows and there's nothing wrong with running it that way.
>>   
>>
>
>Yeah, but on mission-critical high-end applications, would you run it on
>windows? I wouldn't. Though maybe I wouldn't run windows either...
>
>
>  
>
>>Isn't the main goal to build working application as quickly as possible?
>>   
>>
>
>I guess this one got beaten to death over my lunch hour ;)
>
>Answer: depends on the job. With no budget or time, yes, faster is king.
>With a healthy budget and/or enough time, no, the main goal is to do it
>right. Priorities shift with time.
>
>
>  
>
>>>Also, ASP.NET 2.0's goals are to cut coding down by 70%, which may get
>>>it closer to CF's level.
>>>      
>>>
>>There are lots of modules available for PHP for doing common tasks, all
>>of them are available on pear.php.net, plus you can borrow LOTS of code
>>from various free apps available on the net.
>>   
>>
>
>Good point, but there are 'modules' (term loosely) out there for any
>language. Typically, I don't use any add-ons on high-traffic areas
>unless they're VERY polished or way out of my development ballpark. I
>like to know exactly what's happening under my hood (though I have heard
>good things about Pear).
>
>
>  
>
>>>Also, we have settled (for good) on SQL Server, therefore ADO.NET would
>>>be ideal for connecting to it.
>>>      
>>>
>>PHP also works with SQL Server, even with stored procedures etc.
>>   
>>
>
>So does CF, but it's still not ADO.NET.
>
>
>
>  
>
>>You can run PHP on Linux or any other OS when you grow and don't like to
>>buy more Windows licenses.
>>   
>>
>
>:) that day may come.
>
>
>  
>
>>>Yes, I know the development costs are an issue as well, but there are
>>>some other issues in play that i'm not going to talk about in this email.
>>>      
>>>
>>Perhaps company politics?
>>   
>>
>
>Yes, and JRun server issues, and the MS .NET marketing campaign.
>
>
>-nathan strutz
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to