CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to the original posters email address, not to the cf-jobs list. In order to reply to the cf-jobs list someone would have to write the cf-jobs email address in specifically or have a bad email client. I'm setting the cf-jobs list to reject any 'reply-to' message which will stop replies but the off topic stuff would still be a problem. The answer to that is something I've been planning for a while which is to use a singe, standard job posting form to post to the list rather than free-flow emails. In other words, you would have to post from the site only for cf-jobs.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > No. I do not want to see the CF-jobs talk littered with chatter and > garbage. its bad enough that people automatically respond to the list > without checking for the sender's email address. Combining the two > lists will really reduce the signal to noise ratio. > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Steve Runyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given how infrequently the lists are used correctly, would it make sense > to > > combine CF-Jobs and CF-Jobs-Talk? I agree that the concept of splitting > the > > two is a good one in theory, but maybe it doesn't make real-world sense. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-jobs-talk/message.cfm/messageid:4098 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-jobs-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11
