As long as you put on there telecommuting as an option and salary offered (rejecting letters like "DOB" or such), I'm all for it. :)
Michael Dinowitz wrote: > CF-Jobs is written so that any reply is automatically sent to the original > posters email address, not to the cf-jobs list. In order to reply to the > cf-jobs list someone would have to write the cf-jobs email address in > specifically or have a bad email client. I'm setting the cf-jobs list to > reject any 'reply-to' message which will stop replies but the off topic > stuff would still be a problem. The answer to that is something I've been > planning for a while which is to use a singe, standard job posting form to > post to the list rather than free-flow emails. In other words, you would > have to post from the site only for cf-jobs. > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> No. I do not want to see the CF-jobs talk littered with chatter and >> garbage. its bad enough that people automatically respond to the list >> without checking for the sender's email address. Combining the two >> lists will really reduce the signal to noise ratio. >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Steve Runyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Given how infrequently the lists are used correctly, would it make sense >> to >>> combine CF-Jobs and CF-Jobs-Talk? I agree that the concept of splitting >> the >>> two is a good one in theory, but maybe it doesn't make real-world sense. >>> >>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-jobs-talk/message.cfm/messageid:4099 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-jobs-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11
