Dear Kris, John, et al.
> If you go this route, a perhaps clearer option for the name is suggested by
> an existing pattern:
> height_at_cloud_top_defined_by_infrared_radiation (or
> _infrared_reflection, or something similar)
>
> This has the added benefit that it puts the emphasis on what is being
> measured, rather than the act of measuring ('retrieval').
I like this solution of John's, if the intention is that this level relates to
cloud top but in practice it can be substantially different, so they're not
quite the same level in geophysical terms, but related.
Cheers
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
